Publications Library

Found 1068 results
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
S
Service USDAForest. Fuel Treatments: Are we doing enough?. Portland: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station; 2018:16.PDF icon science-update-25-1.pdf (3.6 MB)
Service UStates For. Toward Shared Stewardship Across Landscapes: An Outcome-Based Investment Strategy. United States Department of Agriculture; 2018.PDF icon toward-shared-stewardship.pdf (3.6 MB)
Serra-Diaz JM. Disequilibrium of fire-prone forests sets the stage for a rapid decline in conifer dominance during the 21st century Maxwell C, ed. Scientific Reports. 2018;8.
Seidl R. REVIEW: Searching for resilience: addressing the impacts of changing disturbance regimes on forest ecosystem services Spies TA, ed. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2016;53(1).
Seidl R. Spatial variability in tree regeneration after wildfire delays and dampens future bark beetle outbreaks Donato DC, ed. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2016;Online early. Available at: http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2016/11/02/1615263113.full.
Sehrsweeney M, Fischer APaige. Governing ecosystem adaptation: An investigation of adaptive capacity within environmental governance networks. Environmental Science and Policy. 2022;134:46-56.PDF icon Sehrsweeney and Fischer_2022_Governing EcosystemAdaptation_Investigation of Adaptive Capacity within Enviro gov networks.pdf (6.71 MB)
Sedjo R, Tian X. Does Wood Bioenergy Increase Carbon Stocks in Forests?. Journal of Forestry. 2012;110(6):8. Available at: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/saf/jof/2012/00000110/00000006/art00005.
Seavy NE, Alexander JD. Songbird response to wildfire in mixed-conifer forest in south-western Oregon. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 2014;On-line early.
Scott JH. Examining alternative fuel management strategies and the relative contribution of National Forest System land to wildfire risk to adjacent homes – A pilot assessment on the Sierra National Forest, California, USA Thompson MP, ed. Forest Ecology and Management. 2016;362.
Scott RL, Serrano-Ortiz P, Domingo F, Hamerlynck EP, Kowalski AS. Commonalities of Carbon Dioxide Exchange in Semiarid Regions with Monsoon and Mediterranean Climates. Journal of Arid Environments. 2012;84:9. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140196312001231.
Schweizer DW. Assessing relative differences in smoke exposure from prescribed, managed, and full suppression wildland fire Preisler HK, ed. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health . 2019;12(1).
Schweizer DW. Forest fire policy: change conventional thinking of smoke management to prioritize long-term air quality and public health Cisneros R, ed. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health. 2016.
Schwartz MW. Using niche models with climate projections to inform conservation management decisions. Biological Conservation. 2012;155:8. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320712002807.
Schumann, III RL. Wildfire recovery as a “hot moment” for creating fire-adapted communities Mockrin M, ed. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2020;42.
Schultz CA. Policy tools to address scale mismatches: insights from U.S. forest governance Timberlake TJ, ed. Ecology and Society. 2019;24(1).
Schultz CA. Collaborations and capacities to transform fire management Moseley C, ed. Science. 2019;366(6461).
Schultz CA. Policy Design to Support Forest Restoration: The Value of Focused Investment and Collaboration McIntyre KB, ed. Forests. 2018;9(9).
Schultz C. Prescribed Fire Policy Barriers and Opportunities: A Diversity of Challenges and Strategies Across the West. (Huber-Stearns H, ed.). Eugene: University of Oregon ; 2018:33. Available at: https://ewp.uoregon.edu/publications/working.PDF icon WP_86.pdf (3.06 MB)
Schultz CA, Abrams JB, Davis EJ, et al. Disturbance shapes the US forest governance frontier: A review and conceptual framework for understanding governance change. Ambio. 2021;50:2168–2182.PDF icon Schultz et al_2021_Disturbance Shapes US Govt Frontier.pdf (987.73 KB)
Schultz CA. Forest Service fire management and the elusiveness of change Thompson MP, ed. Fire Ecology. 2019;15.
Schoennagel T. Adapt to more wildfire in western North American forests as climate changes Balch JK, ed. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2017;Online early.
Schoennagel TL. Insights from wildfire science: a resource for fire policy discussions. (Morgan P, ed.).; 2016:9 p. Available at: https://www.frames.gov/catalog/21445.
Schmidt A, Punches J, Leavell D, et al. A quantitative wildfire risk assessment using a modular approach of geostatistical clustering and regionally distinct valuations of assets—A case study in Oregon. Plos One. 2022;17(3).PDF icon Schmidt et al_2022_Quantitative Wildfire Risk Assessment Using a Modular Approach of Geostat Clustering_Case Study in OR.pdf (8.18 MB)
Schiks TJ. Modifying the Canadian Fine Fuel Moisture Code for masticated surface fuels Wotton BM, ed. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 2014;Online early. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/WF14041.
Scheele BC, Driscoll DA, Fischer J, Hunter DA. Decline of an Endangered Amphibian During an Extreme Climatic Event. Ecosphere. 2012;3(art101). Available at: http://www.esajournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1890/ES12-00108.1.

Pages